Philosophies

The Case Against Explaining Your Practice to Skeptics

Not every question deserves a defense. On knowing when explanation helps a practice and when it only depletes it.

OriginTeachingPracticeIntegration
The Case Against Explaining Your Practice to Skeptics

A sincere practitioner is often asked, by a skeptical friend or relative, to justify a practice in terms the skeptic will accept.

The impulse to answer fully, with evidence and reasoning the skeptic will find persuasive, is understandable and frequently counterproductive. Some practices simply do not translate well into the register the question was asked in, and forcing the translation can flatten the practice into something smaller than it is.

Subscriber Reading

Continue into the full essay

Sign in to continue with your available reading access and keep your place in the archive.

Subscriber Conversation

Notes from the sanctuary

Subscriber comments stay slower and smaller on purpose: a place for considered reflection instead of a busy thread.

Comments open for active paid members. Join or resume membership to add your own reflection.

No notes yet. The first reflection can set the tone for the rest of the conversation.